Why We Don't Like Decisions Made by Groups
MANAGEMENT |

Why We Don't Like Decisions Made by Groups

A STUDY BY KOUCHAKI, SMITH AND NETCHAEVA REVEALS THAT, IN RESPONSE TO THE SAME UNFAVORABLE DECISION OUTCOME, A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS IS PERCEIVED TO BE LESS FAIR THAN AN INDIVIDUAL

Decision-making is a crucial aspect of organizational life, and we know quite a lot about how group and individual decisions are made. Less is known, however, about how these decisions are received, and if potential differences exist when the decision maker is a group rather than an individual. For example, what happens when a worker receives a layoff notification? Would the fairness of such a decision be perceived differently if it were made by a group rather than an individual? Prior studies found that people think groups are less likely to be influenced by biases. What is still unknown is if the group’s decision is also more likely, or not, to be perceived as fair.
 
A paper by Bocconi Department of Management and Technology’s Ekaterina Netchaeva, Northwestern University’s Maryam Kouchaki, and Cornell University’s Isaac Smith (Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: Fairness Perceptions of Group vs. Individual Decision Makers, in Organization Science, Volume 26, Issue 5, doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0992) interestingly finds that people perceive groups to be less fair than individuals when receiving an unfavorable decision.
 
The authors decided to explore this topic while discussing the idea of the wisdom of the crowd. “The way we think about the wisdom of the crowd usually means that if you make a decision, you make a group decision because in this way it’s going to be a better and wiser decision. But then we started thinking of some instances when this might not be necessarily true” Netchaeva says. “Perhaps when a decision is made by a group rather than an individual, the perception of the final decision could be less positive. So if the group makes the decision and the decision is negative, this adds more of the savor taste”. Evidence of this intuition was found in two experimental studies. But then, to account for this difference in fairness perceptions, in another experiment the authors also show that it’s the mere presence of a group as a decision-making body that serves as a cue that increases the accessibility of negative group-related associations in the perceiver’s mind. A final test was made with a group of recently laid-off workers. The workers who received a layoff decision made by a group (compared to an individual) were not only more likely to perceive the decision as unfair, but also less likely to endorse the organization.
 
“The interesting thing about our study is that we think about the wisdom of the crowd as something good, but this is not a rule organizations should be following” Netchaeva explains. Sometimes it might be better to conceal who is behind the decision, if a group or an individual, so that individuals are less negatively inclined towards the decision maker.

by Paola Zanella

News

All News
  • Eleanor Spaventa at a European Parliament's AFCO Committee Public Hearing

    She addressed the topic of the right balance between different rights in European Court of Justice's decisions  

  • Baricco and Zecchina: A Writer and a Scientist on Digitization and Beyond

    The dialogue will take place at Bocconi on 28 May, on the occasion of the inauguration of the Vodafone Chair in Machine Learning and Data Science  

Seminars

  June 2018  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • Terrorism Financing, Recruitment and Attacks: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Pakistan

    Nicola Limodio, Bocconi University BROWN BAG SEMINAR

    Meeting Room 2.e4.sr03 - Via Roentgen, 1

  • Bayes Shrinkage at GWAS Scale
    Statistics

    James Johndrow (Stanford University)

    Meeting room 3.e4.sr03 ' Via Roentgen, 1