Corporate Governance Is not Safe from Black Swans
ACCOUNTING |

Corporate Governance Is not Safe from Black Swans

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RISK MANAGEMENT AND RISK GOVERNANCE, IN A BOOK BY SERGIO BERETTA

A lack of risk culture among top management is not a major problem anymore in listed firms. Yet a gap still separates awareness and practices. “Risk management is one thing, risk governance is another”, says Sergio Beretta, Professor of Planning and Control Systems. “Risk management devises specific measures to deal with risks. At top management level, however, there must be a risk management strategy providing skills and resources to the organization. According to the most recent studies on large firms, there is still a huge gap between the awareness on risk and the work done to set up an integrated risk management system”.
 
Current corporate governance codes feature chapters on risk management that are too generic and oversimplified. Professor Beretta pinpoints two major problems. “First, there is no comprehensive definition of all contexts of risk exposure. Three different contexts must be taken into account: those in which we have a reasonable knowledge of both the chance of occurrence and the expected impact of known risks; those in which we know the existence of risks, but we do not know their impact; those in which we are not aware of the risk exposure. The so-called black swans belong to the latter category. They are unexpected and yet have catastrophic effects. The guidelines do not mention these contexts or the way to deal with them”.
 
The second problem is risk appetite, that is the quantification of the amount of risk that a firm is willing to take. In order to spread awareness on risk appetite, it has been defined in a very generic way that is of little help in implementing it at the operational level. “We must rethink risk governance”, professor Beretta concludes. “Today, it is not adequate to deal with all the risks inherent in businesses”.

Read more about this topic:
Massimo Marinacci. Understanding Risk in Companies and Our Lives
The Real Trouble Starts When We Think We Can Calculate Everything
A Bridge Where Decision Theory Meets Risk Analysis
Policy Makers React to Ambiguity Like Other Humans Do
No Economic System Is Safe. Shocks Travel Quickly and Unexpectedly
When International Trade Increases the Chance of Conflict
With the Monte Carlo simulations, an epochal revolution in the probabilistic risk assessment of business plans has arrived
How to Make Your Non-performing Loans Harmless
New Sanitation System Can Half Healthcare Associated Infections and Reduce Related Costs by 75%

by Claudio Todesco

News

All News
  • Bocconi's School of Law Joins the American Society of Comparative Law

    The association, founded in 1951, publishes the prestigious American Journal of Comparative Law  

  • Saving the Oceans from the Land: The Role of Businesses

    Two thirds of Mediterranean businesses are unaware of their impact on marine sustainability or are inactive in mitigation. But there is hope, thanks to the 34% of companies defined as sustainability leaders, according to a Report for the One Ocean Foundation by researchers from SDA Bocconi, McKinsey, and CSIC  

Seminars

  November 2019  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • Bank Transparency and Deposit Flows

    Itay Goldstein, Wharton University of Pennsylvania

    Meeting Room 2.e4.sr03 - Via Roentgen, 1

  • Bayesian Auctions with Efficient Queries
    Economic Theory, Decision Theory and Experimental Economics

    Jing Chen (Stony Brook University) Paper

    Seminar Room 3.e4.sr03 - Via Roentgen 1