Policy Makers React to Ambiguity Like Other Humans Do
ECONOMICS |

Policy Makers React to Ambiguity Like Other Humans Do

RESEARCHERS, JOURNALISTS OR STUDENTS: THE KNOWN IS BETTER THAN THE UNKNOWN FOR EVERYONE, AS DEMONSTRATED BY AN EXPERIMENT BY VALENTINA BOSETTI

When faced with ambiguity, the elites who develop responses to climate change do not act rationally. Like many of us, they are ambiguity adverse. Behavioral traits and preferences of climate policymakers are the focus of a field experiment run by Valentina Bosetti and Loïc Berger during COP 21, the Paris climate conference in 2015.
 
Negotiators, researchers, journalists and representatives of the private sector originating from 52 countries were confronted with urns containing red and black balls. Each urn described a different type of uncertainty: the number of red and black balls was known or unknown or randomly determined. Participants facing pairs of urns were asked to pick one of two, with a payoff for a correct bet. The ambiguity derived not only from the uncertainty about the occurrence of random events, but also from the lack of information. This is the typical situation in which climate policymakers are called upon to make decisions based on experts’ conflicting evaluations.
 
“We ran a similar experiment on university students at the Bocconi Experimental Laboratory in the Social Sciences”, Valentina Bosetti says. Policymakers behaved just like students, proving to be consistently ambiguity adverse: they preferred situations where the probabilities were known to situations where they were unknown. “Their preferences were not due to an irrational behavior or to the inability to perform probability computations, but to intrinsic preferences in the face of unknown probabilities. Our experiment is the first step in understanding the ambiguity aversion of social planners”.

Read more about this topic:
Massimo Marinacci. Understanding Risk in Companies and Our Lives
The Real Trouble Starts When We Think We Can Calculate Everything
Corporate Governance Is not Safe from Black Swans
A Bridge Where Decision Theory Meets Risk Analysis
No Economic System Is Safe. Shocks Travel Quickly and Unexpectedly
When International Trade Increases the Chance of Conflict
With the Monte Carlo simulations, an epochal revolution in the probabilistic risk assessment of business plans has arrived
How to Make Your Non-performing Loans Harmless
New Sanitation System Can Half Healthcare Associated Infections and Reduce Related Costs by 75%

by Claudio Todesco

News

All News
  • Research and Policy to Tackle Climate Change

    Bocconi students on the economics seminars organized by IGIER. In the third article of the series, Federico Scabbia reports on the work of Solomon Hsiang, Berkeley University, Christian Gollier, Toulouse University, and Tom van Ierland, DG Climate Action  

  • Why American Deterrence May Not Work

    In a world with many well armed and unpredictable countries, tough talk from the US is riskier than ever  

Seminars

  November 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • Uncertainty and Information Acquisition: Evidence From Firms and Consumers

    Christopher Roth, Warwick In order to receive the invitation link for the online streaming, please contact dip.fin@unibocconi.it

    Webinar

  • Power of Words: How Do Employee Narratives Shape Our Understanding of Managerial Incompetence?

    Amit Nigam, Class Business School

    Webinar joint with CERGAS