How the Axes of Political Belonging Change

How the Axes of Political Belonging Change


Given that the processes of globalization and automation have exacerbated economic inequalities, why do the losers from globalization vote for a party that is proposing a flat tax and not for a party that promotes redistributive policies? Nicola Gennaioli and Guido Tabellini provide the answer in Identity, Beliefs and Political Conflict.
“Large shocks changed the political conflict”, Professor Tabellini says. “New cleavages in society emerged, dividing winners and losers from globalization and automation. The split between left and right has become less important”. The authors integrated the social psychology of groups in political economic analysis. According to them, shocks cause individuals to change their social identity which may be defined by their occupation, region of residence, social class or religious belief.
“There is an element of depersonalization in the acquiring of a social identity. Individuals stereotype themselves by viewing themselves more as members of their group than as unique personalities. Thus, the winners from globalization who identify with an educated and urban group are led to praise cosmopolitan policies, whereas the losers from globalization are driven to exacerbate the conflict between nationalists and cosmopolitans and to mitigate the class conflict”.
In other words, globalization causes income inequality to increase, but the polarization of conflict between nationalists and cosmopolitans dampens the demand for redistribution by those who would benefit from it. There is more. Political dimensions are correlated across individuals. Voters who traditionally identified with left-wing groups are now attracted by nationalism because it satisfies their demand for protection and also their views over immigration and civil rights. Opinion polls in France and the U.S. have confirmed the theory. “This is not a passing phenomenon. The shocks that have caused it are not transitory. They may further exacerbate”.

Read more about this topic:
Nicola Gennaioli. The naive illusion of human rationality
The Influence of Others on University Study Choices
Anger Can Hurt Us and Others
Thinking About It Beats Repeating It
Other Peoples’ Choices Make Organizations Similar
Making Rational Decision Is Good for Performance
Political Corruption Scars Young Voters Forever

by Claudio Todesco


All News
  • Research and Policy to Tackle Climate Change

    Bocconi students on the economics seminars organized by IGIER. In the third article of the series, Federico Scabbia reports on the work of Solomon Hsiang, Berkeley University, Christian Gollier, Toulouse University, and Tom van Ierland, DG Climate Action  

  • Why American Deterrence May Not Work

    In a world with many well armed and unpredictable countries, tough talk from the US is riskier than ever  


  November 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29


All Seminars
  • Uncertainty and Information Acquisition: Evidence From Firms and Consumers

    Christopher Roth, Warwick In order to receive the invitation link for the online streaming, please contact


  • Power of Words: How Do Employee Narratives Shape Our Understanding of Managerial Incompetence?

    Amit Nigam, Class Business School

    Webinar joint with CERGAS