Quantitative Easing Kept Populism at Bay, but Now We Need a Common Fiscal Policy
POLITICAL SCIENCES |

Quantitative Easing Kept Populism at Bay, but Now We Need a Common Fiscal Policy

MASSIMO MORELLI, IN A SUERF POLICY NOTE, UNDERLINES THE ROLE PLAYED BY THE ECB AND ADVOCATES A FISCAL UNION TO MAKE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICIES POSSIBLE AGAIN

The European Central Bank (ECB) quantitative easing has been, so far, the only effective levee against the populist wave that threats to take over Europe, Massimo Morelli, Full Professor at Bocconi’s Department of Social and Political Sciences, argues in a SUERF Policy Note. A common fiscal policy must now kick in, though. “Monetary policy is not enough”, Professor Morelli says, “because populist waves are not the result of temporary shocks, but of structural problems”.
 
On the one hand, immigration, globalization, automation, debt servicing costs, and capital tax competition are working as a straight-jacket on governments’ chances to implement redistributive fiscal policies. On the other, a weak response to the crisis, perceived as due to the lack of national control on both fiscal and monetary policies, fans the populist fire and nationalist rhetoric.
 
The main difference between the Great Recession of the last decade and any other previous crisis is what Prof. Morelli calls “an empty fiscal space”. The tax rate has a lower boundary, determined by the minimum necessary to make the state function, and an upper boundary, determined by the willingness to participate of the less willing between firms and workers. When wages are high, firms are less willing to participate; when wages plummet, workers’ willingness decreases. When the lower and the upper bounds match, the fiscal space is empty.
 
In the last decade, capital tax competition let the labor base bear the brunt of taxation, in a time when immigration, globalization and automation were causing lower wages. Welfare expenses resulted, thus, very hard to cover. With no resources to negotiate, the traditional left-right cleavage makes no sense, in favor of a nationalism-globalism divide. Hence the populist nationalist rhetoric.
 
“Only the quantitative easing ECB policy, reducing debt servicing cost, allowed a temporarily larger fiscal space”, says Prof. Morelli, “and kept populism at bay”.
 
A fiscal union could reduce volatility, inequality and cultural clashes, as well as reducing competition in capital tax, but current EU fiscal rules make national fiscal policies pro-cyclical, with a political cost (populism) that has an economic cost (supernational policies made impossible by nationalist pressures).
 
“The trap”, Prof. Morelli writes, “goes as follows: structural shrinking of fiscal space → resentment and populism → protectionism and nationalism → more difficult European and global cooperation, where these would instead be the channels through which fiscal space could be recreated”.
 
Quantitative easing weakened the strength of the populist wave, but it covered the need to recreate structural fiscal space for welfare policies. “This can be done either through a more centralized countercyclical European level fiscal policy or, more generally, introducing new ideas about how to tax capital and asset earnings”, Prof. Morelli concludes. And suggests an idea: linking the participation to a supranational capital taxation scheme to WTO membership, something most countries can’t do without.
 
Massimo Morelli, The Paradox of Endogenous Nationalism and the Role of Quantitative Easing, SUERF Policy Note No 140.

by Fabio Todesco

News

All News
  • Quantum Physics and Statistical Physics for Machine Learning Meet at Bocconi

    In the early days of next week the University will virtually host 300 participants of the ELLIS Workshop on Quantum and Physics Based Machine Learning  

  • Two Generations of Bayesian Statisticians Meet at BayesLab Webinars

    The Bocconi research unit on Bayesian statistics will host an online seminar series in which outstanding young researchers will have the opportunity to present their work and get feedback from toplevel senior scholars  

Seminars

  July 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • RELAZIONE SULL'ATTIVITA' SVOLTA DALL'ARBITRO BANCARIO FINANZIARIO NEL 2019
    Private law

    COORDINA: PIETRO SIRENA Direttore della Scuola di Giurisprudenza PRESENTANO LA RELAZIONE: MAGDA BIANCO Capo Dipartimento tutela dei clienti ed educazione finanziaria, Banca d’Italia; MARGHERITA CARTECHINI Dipartimento tutela dei clienti ed educazione finanziaria, Banca d’Italia; NE DISCUTONO: FRANCESCO GIAVAZZI Senior Professor dell'Università Bocconi; SABINO CASSESE Giudice emerito della Corte Costituzionale e professore emerito della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. CONCLUDONO: ALESSANDRA PERRAZZELLI Vice direttrice generale della Banca d’Italia; MARCO VENTORUZZO Direttore del Dipartimento di Studi giuridici

    Webinar

  • Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the local economy: Evidence from the restaurant industry

    DAVIDE PROSERPIO, USC

    Webinar