Other Peoples' Choices Make Organizations Similar
POLITICAL SCIENCES |

Other Peoples' Choices Make Organizations Similar

THE ROLE AND EFFECTS OF ISOMORPHIC PRESSURES ON THE EFFICIENCY AND RATIONALITY OF INDIVIDUAL CHOICES, IN A SERIES OF EXPERIMENTS VALENTINA MELE AND PAOLO BELARDINELLI

Imagine that a civil servant, when purchasing a software package, is informed that the application, although recommended by his professional association, is a suboptimal choice. What will he do? Will he conform his choice to that of his peers or will he choose an alternative? This is the kind of question that Valentina Mele and Paolo Belardinelli have asked while investigating the decisions of civil servants managers through eight experiments conducted with Nicola Bellé and Paola Cantarelli.
 
“In the literature, isomorphism is the process by which organizations become similar to each other”, they say. “We have investigated the micro-foundations of isomorphism to find out if isomorphic pressures lead to suboptimal decision making in the context of public administration”.
 
The authors asked 764 public employees to imagine themselves as a superintendent who has to choose between two refresher courses or two software packages. One option was explicitly worse than the other, yet supported by guidelines, colleagues or professional associations. Without isomorphic pressures, 11% to 17% of individuals, depending on the experiment, chose the worst option. With isomorphic pressures, the percentage rose to a maximum of 63%. “According to a qualitative inquiry, civil servants have not engaged in irrational choices. They opted for the suboptimal option because it actually met some need; because it guaranteed uniformity of the public sector; because they trust institutions and colleagues who make recommendations”. The risk of a suboptimal decision is lessened when subjects have to autonomously infer the inferiority of the recommended option from data. “Beware: isomorphic pressure does not necessarily lead to suboptimal decisions. Isomorphism should be used with awareness to promote evidence-based choices”.

Read more about this topic:
Nicola Gennaioli. The naive illusion of human rationality
The Influence of Others on University Study Choices
Anger Can Hurt Us and Others
Thinking About It Beats Repeating It
Making Rational Decision Is Good for Performance
How the Axes of Political Belonging Change
Political Corruption Scars Young Voters Forever
 

by Claudio Todesco
Bocconi Knowledge newsletter

News

  • Caselli, Ventoruzzo and Mosca Join the Committee for the Reform of Capital Markets

    The activities will lead to the new Consolidated Text  

  • Bocconi Research Excellence Awards 2024

    Faculty whose publications have been accepted by the most prestigious journals or publishers honored  

Seminars

  June 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Seminars

  • Jacopo Perego: Competitive Markets for Personal Data

    JACOPO PEREGO - Columbia Business School

    Room 3-E4-SR03 (Rontgen)

  • Alessia Caponera - Multiscale CUSUM tests for time-dependent spherical random fields

    ALESSIA CAPONERA - LUISS

    Room 3-E4-SR03 (Roentgen)