Europe, Don't Give up!
NEWS |

Europe, Don't Give up!

IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE EU TO AVOID RELAXING ITS POLICIES ON COMPETITION, ACCORDING TO CHIARA FUMAGALLI

The economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has led to massive state intervention and is sparking a new round of debate about EU competition policy. In March 2020, the European Union asked firms to suspend their merger filings. Some commentators have suggested that the pandemic is an opportunity for the EU to improve long term growth by allowing so-called “zombie companies” to find stronger partners and that merger control should therefore be made more permissive.
 
In “Which Role for State Aid and Merger Control During and After the Covid Crisis?” published in the Journal of European Competition and Law Practice, Bocconi University’s Associate Professor at the Department of Economics Chiara Fumagalli, along with Massimo Motta and Martin Peitz, argue that competition rules should not be relaxed.
 
“To loosen competition policy in terms of merger control will lead to inefficiencies that will have persistent effects,” explained Fumagalli. “There are other instruments that are more effective and create fewer distortions.”
 
The crisis has affected different sectors in difference ways, the paper points out, and therefore policy responses should be tailored accordingly. For example, “Among these expected winners of the COVID crisis there are the big digital platforms, which reinforces the need for competition policy to deal with their increasingly dominant positions,” the authors say. Firms selling groceries and health care products are other examples.
 
For those sectors where the crisis will have a temporary effect, well-designed state aid “should be welcome,” but relaxing merger rules would be counterproductive. The authors cite research on Japanese banks in the 1990s and on Italian banks during the sovereign debt crisis to assert that the market when left alone does not always pick the most efficient firms.
 
Finally, in those sectors where the crisis is likely to have a long-term impact, like airlines, cinemas, and trade fairs, for example, “both state aid and the relaxation of competition rules carry big risks and often lead to inefficient outcomes and thus a misallocation of resources,” the article says.
 
It should be noted that in September 2020, EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager ruled out a more permissive approach and warned “this is not the time to give up on competition enforcement.”

by Jennifer Clark Bocconi Knowledge newsletter

People

  • Francesco Giavazzi Becomes Mario Draghi's Economic Adviser

    Within the purview of his new role, carried out pro bono, is the economic analysis for the drafting of Italy's recovery plan  

  • A Research Grant to Study Research Grants

    Thank to funding from the Academic Research Program of the European Patent Office, Jerome Adda and Marco Ottaviani will study the impact of research grants on innovation  

Seminars

  May 2021  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Seminars

  • Markups and Inequality
    Macroeconomics - Joint with CREI-UPF

    Corina Boar (New York University) Paper

    Webinar

  • TRADE RULES AND STATE INTERVENTION IN THE ECONOMY IN THE COVID ERA
    International law

    INTRODUCTORY REMARKS LEONARDO BORLINI, Associate Professor of International Law at Bocconi University   SPEAKERS ELEANOR FOX, Walter J. Derenberg Professor of Trade Regulation at New York University School of Law MITSUO MATSUSHITA, Professor Emeritus at Tokyo University, Former Member of the WTO Appellate Body AYA LINO, Associate Professor at Nihon University, College of Commerce, Tokyo THOMAS J. SCHOENBAUM, Shefelman Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Washington School of Law   CONCLUDING REMARKS GIORGIO SACERDOTI Professor Emeritus at Bocconi University and Former Member and Chair of the WTO Appellate Body   Registration online is not required.   Link di collegamento

    Webinar