Tinkering with Public Debt We Doom Innovation and Growth
FINANCE |

Tinkering with Public Debt We Doom Innovation and Growth

NEW RESEARCH BY MAX CROCE AND COLLEAGUES SHOWS THAT INNOVATIVE FIRMS ARE THE HARDEST HIT BY THE UNCERTAINTY GENERATED BY AN INCREASE IN PUBLIC DEFICIT

We already knew that budget consolidations following surges in government debt hamper long run growth through higher tax pressure, raises in inflation, and political uncertainty. New research by Bocconi’s Max Croce and colleagues finds that public debt is bad for growth also because it hinders innovative firms’ investment. «By affecting their cost of capital, movements in government debt impact firms’ investment and, critically, innovation decisions», Max Croce, Professor of Finance at Bocconi University, says.
 
Analyzing 6,000 firms listed in the US through the 1975-2013 period, the scholars find that around one third of the premium that innovative firms have to pay to their investors compared to run-of-the-mill companies depends on the exposure to fiscal variables. «This spread is huge», Prof. Croce says, «at around 7.5% per year and it could decline to 5% if there were no fiscal uncertainty».
 

 
When public debt is on the rise, spikes in interest rates and uncertainty on future fiscal pressure, the argument goes, make future cash flow less predictable and suggest caution to both investors and managers. When it comes to select which projects to invest in, uncertainty forces managers to choose only the most profitable, dropping the riskiest ones, lest investors could switch to firms perceived as safer». The net result is a GDP growth drop in 4/5 years, when the lack of innovation starts to affect the national economy. A public debt of 100% means a decline in GDP growth of 4% after five years compared to a “normal” debt of 60%.
 
«Our results mean that a policy of `prudential austerity’, that is, a commitment to reduce public debt during good economic times paired with fiscal policies that prevent long-run tax uncertainty, could be the most effective», Prof. Croce says. «On the one hand, a systematic use of budget deficits undermines growth and, on the other, indebted countries risk to experience down cycles with no leeway for fiscal stimuli».
 
Mariano Croce, Thien T. Nguyen, Steve Raymond, Lukas Schmid, Government Debt and Returns to Innovation, in press in Journal of Financial Economics, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.11.010.

by Fabio Todesco

News

All News
  • Research and Policy to Tackle Climate Change

    Bocconi students on the economics seminars organized by IGIER. In the third article of the series, Federico Scabbia reports on the work of Solomon Hsiang, Berkeley University, Christian Gollier, Toulouse University, and Tom van Ierland, DG Climate Action  

  • Why American Deterrence May Not Work

    In a world with many well armed and unpredictable countries, tough talk from the US is riskier than ever  

Seminars

  November 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • Uncertainty and Information Acquisition: Evidence From Firms and Consumers

    Christopher Roth, Warwick In order to receive the invitation link for the online streaming, please contact dip.fin@unibocconi.it

    Webinar

  • Power of Words: How Do Employee Narratives Shape Our Understanding of Managerial Incompetence?

    Amit Nigam, Class Business School

    Webinar joint with CERGAS