Costs and Benefits of Social Distancing, Italy and UK Compared
PEOPLE |

Costs and Benefits of Social Distancing, Italy and UK Compared

PAMELA GIUSTINELLI WORKS WITH GABRIELLA CONTI, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON, ON THE MEDIUM TERM OUTCOMES OF THE LOCKDOWN

How have Italians and Britons reacted to the lockdown? Have containment measures been effective? How did they evaluate them in terms of costs and benefits? And what aftermath did they leave behind on people's lives and minds? These are some of the questions addressed by the research study of Pamela Giustinelli, professor at the Bocconi Department of Economics and Fellow of the COVID Crisis Lab, with colleague Gabriella Conti at University College London, which was funded by the European Research Council. The study looks at the medium-term outcomes of the lockdown to help public authorities evaluate the most effective incentives to increase people's respect of the principles of social distancing. A preliminary analysis of the data on the first wave suggests that British citizens perceived lockdown measures as decidedly effective but also very harmful to physical and mental health.
 
The outlook for the future is sobering both for the UK and Italy: most of the participants expect to return to normal only when a vaccine is developed or in any case not before 2021. "The first batch of questionnaires was distributed in the two countries in first days of May, and a second one has recently followed ", Giustinelli says. "In the case of Italy, the first wave questionnaires focused on the experience with coronavirus and risk perceptions ahead of Phase 2, while the second one investigates the respect of behavioral rules and protocols to restart the economy and movement of people, and testing and tracing systems to track COVID-19.".
 
The most original aspect of the research is looking into the decision-making mechanisms that arise in moments of uncertainty, a fact that is obtained with a precise survey methodology that consists in measuring conditional risk expectations (in particular the subjective probability of being infected by the coronavirus) and other costs and benefits deriving from the individual and/or collective adoption of the rules of conduct and TTT measures (Testing, Tracing, Treatment). In the second wave, these measurements were combined with a randomized treatment of "information and awareness" on TTT measures. "Also in this case we expect to register heterogeneity in individual responses", explains the researcher, "but to be able to define a behavioral model that shows how people perceive and resolve the trade-offs they are facing, depending on their knowledge, beliefs and preferences".

by Emanuele Elli

News

All News
  • Understanding the Consequences of the COVID19 Lockdown for Older People

    A large scale survey of elderly folks will explore the real effects of the lockdown in order to prepare for similar events in the future  

  • Labor Policy, the Real Trump Agenda Has Yet to Start

    The President's moves are generally anti labor and specifically anti Obama, according to Davide Zecca's analysis  

Seminars

  October 2020  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Seminars      

All Seminars
  • Marital Property Regimes and Investments: Evidence from Spain
    PhD JM Practice Talk - Applied Microeconomics

    Blanka Imre, Bocconi University

    Webinar

  • Gender Equality

    Introduction: Paola Profeta, Bocconi University Keynote Speaker: Matthias Doepke, Northwestern University Winners of the Unicredit Foundation Best Paper Award on Gender Economics: Silvia Griselda University of Melbourne Lingwei Wu, University of Bonn Xinyu Fan, Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business (CKGSB) Conclusions: Laura Penna, UniCredit

    Online Conference