Costs and Benefits of Social Distancing, Italy and UK Compared

Costs and Benefits of Social Distancing, Italy and UK Compared


How have Italians and Britons reacted to the lockdown? Have containment measures been effective? How did they evaluate them in terms of costs and benefits? And what aftermath did they leave behind on people's lives and minds? These are some of the questions addressed by the research study of Pamela Giustinelli, professor at the Bocconi Department of Economics and Fellow of the COVID Crisis Lab, with colleague Gabriella Conti at University College London, which was funded by the European Research Council. The study looks at the medium-term outcomes of the lockdown to help public authorities evaluate the most effective incentives to increase people's respect of the principles of social distancing. A preliminary analysis of the data on the first wave suggests that British citizens perceived lockdown measures as decidedly effective but also very harmful to physical and mental health.
The outlook for the future is sobering both for the UK and Italy: most of the participants expect to return to normal only when a vaccine is developed or in any case not before 2021. "The first batch of questionnaires was distributed in the two countries in first days of May, and a second one has recently followed ", Giustinelli says. "In the case of Italy, the first wave questionnaires focused on the experience with coronavirus and risk perceptions ahead of Phase 2, while the second one investigates the respect of behavioral rules and protocols to restart the economy and movement of people, and testing and tracing systems to track COVID-19.".
The most original aspect of the research is looking into the decision-making mechanisms that arise in moments of uncertainty, a fact that is obtained with a precise survey methodology that consists in measuring conditional risk expectations (in particular the subjective probability of being infected by the coronavirus) and other costs and benefits deriving from the individual and/or collective adoption of the rules of conduct and TTT measures (Testing, Tracing, Treatment). In the second wave, these measurements were combined with a randomized treatment of "information and awareness" on TTT measures. "Also in this case we expect to register heterogeneity in individual responses", explains the researcher, "but to be able to define a behavioral model that shows how people perceive and resolve the trade-offs they are facing, depending on their knowledge, beliefs and preferences".

by Emanuele Elli


All News
  • Emotions Power Public Administration

    Research by Turrini, Cristofoli, and Valotti finds a shared feature in the realization of COVID hospitals in Milan, New York, and Wuhan  

  • Fiscal Expansion: Spend as if You Have to Pay It Back

    Bocconi students on the seminars organized by IGIER. In the latest article of the series, Sviatoslav Tiupin reports on the work of Olivier Blanchard and John Cochrane  


  January 2021  
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


All Seminars
  • The Department of Finance will be interviewing and holding seminars with selected candidates on the following dates:   January 12th January 14th January 15th January 18th January 22nd January 25th January 27th February 1st February 3rd   Selected candidates will be contacted individually via e-mail. If you would like to follow the candidate's seminar you can contact the department administration office at

  • Flexible Wages, Bargaining, and the Gender Gap

    Barbara Biasi (Yale)